Tag: how to interview staff

Posted on

Leveraging Psychological Tricks to Ace the Job Interview

In today’s competitive job market, only the strongest interviewees are offered high-paying roles.

While stating job experience and qualifications on the application form will get you a job interview it is the persuasive communication skills of the career professional that lands a job offer. The interview is where you truly make your case. Interviews are more than just answering questions—they’re about persuasion, impression management, and connecting with your interviewer on multiple levels.

Understanding psychological principles will give the savvy candidate an edge over the competition. The article explores how psychological tricks, rooted in the science of persuasion and social psychology, can increase an interviewee’s ability to win over the interview panel.

Cialdini’s Principles of Persuasion in Job Interviews

You can’t write an article on the psychology of persuasion without quoting Cialdini.

Reciprocity: Building Rapport by Giving (and then receiving)

The principle of reciprocity is simple: people feel obligated to return favours.

In an interview setting, reciprocity has to be subtle. By offering something of value to the interviewer—whether it’s information, insight, or a genuine compliment can create an overwhelming need for the interviewer to offer something in return for the initial ‘gift’. 

For instance, during a discussion about the company’s challenges, offering a thoughtful idea or a unique perspective can create a sense of reciprocity. The interviewer might feel more inclined to view you favorably because you’ve provided something of value that they can use.

Authority: Presenting Yourself as an Expert

Interviewers are looking for candidates who can bring expertise to their roles.

By subtly establishing yourself as an authority in your field, you can significantly enhance your appeal. This doesn’t mean bragging; instead, it involves demonstrating your knowledge through well-prepared, detailed answers. Citing relevant experience, referring to industry standards, or mentioning certifications can all help establish your authority.

The interview prediction grid model (interview identity test) explains how being seen as a confident expert (charismatic interview identity) in the recruitment process vastly increases the chances of a candidate being offered the advertised role. The key is to balance confidence with humility, ensuring you come across as knowledgeable but not arrogant (egocentric interview identity).

Social Proof: Leveraging the Power of Testimonials and References

Social proof, the idea that people look to others to determine what is correct, can be powerful in an interview.

Providing examples (embedding the examples within the job interview answer) of positive feedback from previous employers, clients, or colleagues can reinforce your suitability for the job.

In addition, persuasive applicants will reference LinkedIn recommendations or bring up relevant endorsements which subtly remind the interviewer that others have recognized the candidate’s abilities. Many employers look at candidates LinkedIn profile prior to the interview and the applicant’s content, posts, and any recommendations create either a ‘halo’ or ‘horns effect.

It is also powerful to discuss how another employer has already offered the applicant a job, as this creates scarcity of persuasion as well as social proof.

Social proof not only boosts an interviewee’s credibility but also aligns with the interviewer’s desire to select a candidate validated by others.

Liking: Building a Personal Connection

People are more likely to say yes to someone they like.

During an interview, finding common ground with the interviewer can be invaluable. Common ground could be something as simple as a shared interest, or a similar career path, or any commonality (attended the same university, both eat at the same restaurant, or watch the same TV programme – all personal information that is easy to find on social media platforms once a job seeker has the interviewers name).

Engaging in light, relevant conversations about these topics can make the interviewee more likable. However, authenticity is crucial; forced attempts to connect can have the opposite effect.

In addition, showing genuine interest in the interviewer and the company culture can foster a positive, likable impression.

Scarcity: Highlighting Your Unique Qualities

Scarcity, the idea that people value what is rare, can be used to a career professional’s advantage by highlighting what makes them uniquely qualified for the position.

Whether it’s a rare skill set, a unique experience, a track record of being successful in the sector, or an uncommon perspective, emphasizing these aspects can make you stand out. For example, if you have experience in a niche area that the company is looking to expand into, make sure to bring this to the forefront during your interview.

Remember the other job applicants are likely to have a similar level of academia, experience, and knowledge, what the persuasive interviewee offers is something unique and valuable in addition to the norm.

Consistency: Aligning with the Company’s Values

People like to see consistency in others’ behaviour and beliefs.

In an interview, this means aligning your answers and examples with the company’s core values and mission. Researching the company thoroughly beforehand will help you tailor your responses to reflect these values.

If a company values innovation, for example, sharing past experiences where you brought new ideas to life can show that you’re a good fit. Consistency between what you say and what the company stands for can significantly strengthen your candidacy.

Cognitive Biases in Interviews

Halo Effect: Making a Strong First Impression

The halo effect is a cognitive bias where an initial positive impression influences subsequent judgments.

In a job interview, the first few minutes are crucial in setting the tone for the rest of the conversation. A confident handshake, a warm smile, and professional attire contribute to a strong first impression.

Preparing a succinct, compelling introduction about yourself that highlights key strengths can also help trigger the halo effect. Once the interviewer has a positive initial impression, they are more likely to view the rest of your responses through that favourable lens.

Warning: the horns effect is the opposite of the halo effect, a first bad impression (sweaty handshake, stuttering introduction, and weak body language) will create a negative lens that all interview answers are filtered through.

Anchoring: Setting the Tone for Key Discussions

Anchoring refers to the tendency to rely heavily on the first piece of information encountered when making decisions.

This piece of psychology can be used to the applicant’s advantage in an interview by setting the tone early by discussing a key success, or a unique selling point, something that the employer requires.

In a similar vein, when asked about your experience, starting with the most impressive achievement can set a high standard for the rest of the interview.

The technique is also used during salary negotiations. For example, if salary is discussed, mentioning a higher figure early on can serve as an anchor, making subsequent negotiations more favorable to you.

Confirmation Bias: Reinforcing Positive Assumptions

Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, and remember information in a way that confirms our own preconceptions.

As an example, If an interviewee can create a positive perception early in the interview, confirmation bias may cause the interviewer to focus on aspects of their responses that reinforce the interviewers positive view, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Subtly guide this process by consistently tying the interview answers back to stated strengths and experiences that align with the job requirements. Remember the three rules for a successful job interview are 1) identify the job criteria, 2) be a self-promoter 3) communicate with confidence.

By reinforcing the interviewer’s positive assumptions, the candidate will be remembered by the interviewer more favorably (and stated weaknesses that slip out during the interview will be subconsciously dismissed).

Nonverbal Communication: The Silent Influencer

Body Language: Conveying Confidence and Openness

Much research shows how body language can significantly influence how a person is perceived in an interview.

Open, confident postures – sitting up straight, leaning slightly forward, and using hand gestures when speaking—can convey confidence and self-assurance.

Avoid closed-off gestures such as crossing your arms, which can make you appear defensive.

Smiling (naturally not forced) and nodding occasionally when the interviewer speaks can also signal an attentive and agreeable candidate.

Eye Contact and Mirroring: Establishing Trust

Maintaining appropriate eye contact is crucial in building trust and rapport during an interview.

Eye contact shows confidence and sincerity. However, it’s important to strike a balance as too much eye contact can be perceived as aggressive, while too little can suggest insecurity.

Mirroring (subtly mimicking the interviewer’s body language), can also create a subconscious rapport. For example, if the interviewer leans forward, the candidate can mirror the same a few moments later. Mirroring can also be used verbally; mimicking tonality, volume, and word choice.

The mirroring technique can make the interviewer feel more comfortable and connected to the job applicants, increasing their chances of being remembered positively.

Hand Gestures: Enhancing Verbal Communication

Using hand gestures while speaking can make an interviewee’s verbal communication more engaging and memorable as research suggests that people who use hand gestures are often perceived as more energetic and enthusiastic.

Hand gestures can be particularly useful when explaining complex ideas or discussing your experiences. However, it’s essential to keep gestures natural and not overdo them, as excessive movement can be distracting.

Impression Management Techniques

Self-Promotion: Highlighting Your Achievements Effectively

Self-promotion involves presenting accomplishments in a way that highlights your competence without coming across as boastful.

When discussing achievements, focus on how the achievements benefited your previous employers and what you learned from those experiences.

For example, instead of saying, “I was the top salesperson,” you might say, “I consistently exceeded my sales targets by doing X, which contributed to a 20% increase in revenue for the company. An alternative way to achieve sales targets was to do Y but the negative impact of this approach was Z, which is why on this occasion I chose the first approach” This not only highlights your success but also demonstrates your understanding of its broader impact.

Ingratiation: Sincerely Complimenting the Interviewer or Company

Ingratiation involves using flattery or compliments to increase your likability.

While flattery is effective (everyone enjoys being praised), it’s important to be sincere.

Complimenting the interviewer on something specific—like their insights during the interview or the company’s recent achievements can create a positive atmosphere.

However, over-complementing or making insincere comments can backfire, making you seem disingenuous. The key is to find opportunities to express genuine admiration or respect without overstepping.

Emotional Intelligence: The Key to Managing Interactions

Self-Regulation: Staying Calm Under Pressure

Job interviews for most are very stressful.

Stress leads the job applicant to act in a way that doesn’t show their true selves, and therefore what the candidate can offer the organisation if they are successful in the recruitment process.

Emotional intelligence plays a critical role in how a career professional handles the stress and pressure of a job interview.

Self-regulation, a key component of emotional intelligence, involves managing your emotions and staying composed.

Techniques like deep breathing or visualization can help calm a person’s nerves before and during the interview. Repetition – attending many job interviews or undertaking mock interviews creates calmness through familiarity (knowing what to expect).

By maintaining composure an interviewee can think more clearly, respond more effectively, and project genuine confidence.

Empathy: Understanding the Interviewer’s Perspective

Empathy -the ability to understand and share the feelings of another, can be a powerful tool in an interview.

By considering the interviewer’s perspective (what they’re looking for in a candidate, their concerns, and their goals, the company values, leadership styles)a savvy candidate can tailor their responses to address the needs of the employer. Rule one for a successful job interview outcome, identify the job criteria.

For example, if  the interviewer is concerned about a gap in an applicants employment history, the candidate can proactively address it by explaining how they used that time productively through, as an example, returning to education.

Being aware of the interviewer’s emotional response to an interview answer can help the interviewee change, adapt or build on the answer depending on their understanding of the employer’s feelings.

Also, demonstrating empathy shows that you are not only a good communicator but also attuned to others’ needs. A vital skill in some job roles.

Evolve the mind book on Amazon

Conclusion

By understanding and applying principles of persuasion, managing cognitive biases, using effective nonverbal communication, and leveraging emotional intelligence during a job interview will significantly increase the chances of a career professional gaining a job offer. 

The techniques discussed will help an interviewee present their best self, making a strong impression. While psychological techniques can give you an edge in job interviews, it’s important to use them ethically. The goal is to present yourself authentically and build genuine connections.

Remember, the key is not just to be prepared, but to be self-aware and responsive to the dynamics of the interview process. With these insights, a job hunter will be well-equipped to navigate your next job interview with confidence.

References

  1. Cialdini, R. B. (2007).Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion (Revised Edition). Harper Business.
    • Cialdini’s book is a foundational text in understanding principles like reciprocity, authority, and social proof, which are crucial in persuasive communication, including job interviews.
  2. Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 428-441.
    • This study explores how first impressions, including nonverbal cues like height, can influence perceptions of authority and competence in professional settings, such as job interviews.
  3. Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623-1626.
    • Discusses how first impressions based on facial appearance can impact judgments of competence, relevant to the halo effect in interviews.
  4. Guthrie, C., & Diekmann, K. A. (2007). Cognitive biases in negotiator judgment: An experimental study. Negotiation Journal, 23(2), 105-119.
    • Explores various cognitive biases, including anchoring and confirmation bias, which are applicable in interview settings when setting expectations and reinforcing positive perceptions.
  5. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry, 32(1), 88-106.
    • This classic study on nonverbal communication is useful for understanding how body language can reveal underlying emotions and intentions during interviews.
  6. Goffman, E. (1959).The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books.
    • Goffman’s work on impression management provides a theoretical foundation for understanding how individuals present themselves in social interactions, including job interviews.
  7. Goleman, D. (1995).Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Bantam Books.
    • Goleman’s book introduces the concept of emotional intelligence, which is key in managing one’s emotions and understanding others during high-stakes situations like job interviews.
  8. Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1990). Busy stores and demanding customers: How do they affect the display of positive emotion? Academy of Management Journal, 33(3), 623-637.
    • This study explores how emotional displays can influence perceptions in professional settings, relevant to the discussion of self-regulation and empathy in interviews.
  9. Kacmar, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. (1991). Perceptions of organizational politics scale (POPS): Development and construct validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(1), 193-205.
    • Explores the role of impression management in organizational contexts, providing insight into tactics like self-promotion and ingratiation during interviews.
  10. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462-479.
    • Discusses the automatic nature of social behavior, including mirroring and other nonverbal communication strategies that can be employed in interviews.

Chris Delaney (2021) Book: What is your interview identity

  • Explains the structured job interview process, unconscious bias and how an interviewee can present the best version of themselves

Posted on

The Science of Job Interviews: Insights from Scholarly Research

Employers understand that job interviews are the critical component of the hiring process, serving as a key mechanism for employers to assess candidates’ suitability for a position.

The fact that no-one employer has found the perfect processing that results in the hiring of their first-choice candidate has led, over the years, to extensive research.

This research has been conducted to understand the intricacies of job interviews, from the structure and format to the biases and perceptions that can influence hiring outcomes.

We have collated the key points from a range of academic research on job interviews, providing hiring managers with the insights into how the major findings from scholarly articles can be optimized for better hiring decisions.

1. Introduction to Job Interviews

The Role of Job Interviews: Job interviews are designed to evaluate a candidate’s skills, experience, and cultural fit within an organisation.

The interview, 1-2-1, panel interview, or more recently video interview – the traditional question and answer job interview format, are used across various industries and at all job levels, for part or full time positions, and for low-level to high-level job roles.

Types of Job Interviews: Interviews can be structured (formal), semi-structured, or unstructured (informal).

Structured interviews, where each candidate is asked the same set of questions and scored against a pre-written scoring criteria, are often found to be more reliable and valid predictors of job performance compared to unstructured interviews.

2. Structured vs. Unstructured Interviews

Research on Structured Interviews:

  • A comprehensive review by Huffcutt and Arthur (1994) found that structured interviews are significantly more reliable than  a unstructured recruitment process.
  • The structured interview reduces the variability in interviewers’ ratings and enhance the objectivity of the hiring process.
  • McDaniel et al. (1994) conducted a meta-analysis showing that structured interviews have higher predictive validity for job performance.

Advantages of Structured Interviews:

  • Consistency: All candidates are evaluated using the same criteria, often using as coring system, making the process fairer.
  • Reliability: Structured interviews provide consistent results over time.
  • Legal Defensibility: They are less likely to be challenged in court as they adhere to standardized procedures.

Challenges with Unstructured Interviews:

  • Bias: Unstructured interviews are prone to interviewer biases, such as halo effects or similarity-attraction biases.
  • Inconsistency: Different interviewers may focus on different aspects of the candidate’s responses, leading to inconsistent evaluations.

3. Biases in Job Interviews

Gender and Racial Bias:

  • Research by Koch, D’Mello, and Sackett (2015) highlights the persistent issue of gender bias in interviews, where women are often rated lower than men for the same qualifications.
  • Studies on racial bias, such as those by Bertrand and Mullainathan (2004), demonstrate that candidates with ethnic-sounding names are less likely to receive callbacks for interviews, indicating a systemic bias in the hiring process.

Strategies to Mitigate Bias:

  • Structured Interviews: As previously mentioned, structured interviews help mitigate biases by standardizing questions and evaluation criteria.
  • Training: Interviewer training programs can raise awareness about unconscious biases and provide strategies to reduce their impact.
  • Blind Hiring: Removing identifiable information (e.g., names, gender) from applications can help ensure candidates are evaluated based on their qualifications alone.

4. Applicant Reactions to Interview Formats

Perceptions of Fairness:

  • Research by Bauer et al. (2001) shows that candidates perceive structured interviews as fairer and more job-related than unstructured interviews.
  • Fairness perceptions are crucial as they can influence a candidate’s willingness to accept a job offer and their overall view of the organization.

Candidate Experience:

  • Chapman and Zweig (2005) found that a positive interview experience can enhance a candidate’s attraction to the organization. This includes clear communication, respectful treatment, and timely feedback.

Impact on Diversity and Inclusion:

  • Structured interviews can support diversity and inclusion efforts by providing a level playing field for all candidates.
  • Studies like those by Ployhart and Holtz (2008) suggest that when properly implemented, structured interviews can help organizations build a more diverse workforce.

5. Behavioral and Situational Interviews

Behavioral Interviews:

  • Based on the premise that past behavior predicts future performance, behavioral interviews ask candidates to describe previous experiences related to job competencies.
  • Taylor and Small (2002) found that behavioral interviews are effective in predicting job performance and reducing biases.

Situational Interviews:

  • Situational interviews present candidates with hypothetical scenarios and ask how they would handle them.
  • Latham and Sue-Chan (1999) suggest that these interviews are particularly useful for assessing problem-solving skills and judgment.

Comparative Effectiveness:

  • A meta-analysis by Huffcutt, Conway, Roth, and Stone (2001) indicates that both behavioral and situational interviews have strong predictive validity, with slight differences depending on the job context and competencies being assessed.
Evolve the mind book on Amazon

6. Technological Advances in Job Interviews

Video Interviews:

  • The rise of video interview platforms has transformed the recruitment landscape. Research by Chapman and Webster (2003) highlights the convenience and cost-effectiveness of video interviews, though they may present challenges such as technical issues and reduced personal interaction.
  • Covid impacted the commonality use of video interviews which are now viewed as the norm.

AI and Automation:

  • AI-driven interview tools are increasingly being used to assess candidates’ responses and non-verbal cues.
  • Studies like those by Chamorro-Premuzic et al. (2016) emphasize the potential of AI to enhance objectivity, though ethical considerations and transparency are critical.

Virtual Reality (VR) Interviews:

  • Emerging technologies like VR are being explored for immersive interview experiences.
  • Slater and Sanchez-Vives (2016) suggest that VR can provide realistic job previews and assess candidates in simulated environments.

Conclusion

The familiar question and answer type Job interview remains a fundamental part of the hiring process, with ongoing research continually enhancing our understanding of best practices to support hiring managers to recruit the most suitable candidate.

Structured interviews, awareness of biases, positive candidate experiences, and technological innovations are key factors that contribute to more effective and equitable hiring decisions. By incorporating insights from scholarly research, organizations can improve their interview processes , leading to better hiring outcomes and a more diverse and competent workforce.

References

  • Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Paronto, M. E., Weekley, J. A., & Campion, M. A. (2001). Applicant reactions to different selection procedures: Are applicants more favorable to face-to-face interviews?
  • Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination.
  • Chapman, D. S., & Zweig, D. I. (2005). Developing a nomological network for interview structure: Antecedents and consequences of the structured selection interview.
  • Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W. Jr. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs.
  • McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.
  • Taylor, P. J., & Small, B. (2002). Asking applicants what they would do versus what they did do: A meta-analytic comparison of situational and past behavior employment interview questions.
  • Koch, A. J., D’Mello, S. D., & Sackett, P. R. (2015). A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.
  • Chris Delaney (2021) Book: What is your interview identity
Posted on

The Best Way To Interview

The wrong hiring decision can cost an organisation, not only financially – A study conducted by the Society for Human Resources Management (SHRM), found that is can cost up to five times a bad hire’s annual salary, but also productively: Research into the positive and negative effects of recruitment at the National Business Research Institute (NBRI) found that  37% of bad hires affected employee morale and 18% of employers found that a bad hire had a direct negative impact on client relationships

The number one reason for bad hiring practices is an employer’s job interview process. This includes a lack of due diligence, interviewers’ assumptions and unconscious biases, and, offering roles based on the applicant’s personality (the nice person) rather than the interviewee’s competences.

Tweaking the interview process is easy to implement and will have a positive impact on future hires.

These 5 job interview steps will help you make the best hire.  

  1. Implement a structured job interview

Much research proves how a structured job interview over an informal job interview improves the rate of a positive hire.

  • A structured job interview is the process of asking job interview questions that have a direct relevance to the job role – this sounds obvious, but during an informal job interview it is easy for the conversation (which is unplanned and more free-flowing) to go off on a tangent.
  • Each job applicant is asked the same, on average 8-10, job interview questions.
  • All questions are marked on a pre-agreed grading system. Each grade will have a list of criteria the interviewee must cover during their interview answer to receive a particular score.
  • This logical approach results in the highest-scoring person being offered the job role.
  1. Have multiple interview rounds (for higher-paid roles)

Commonly, an interview panel (2-3 interviewers) conduct the job interview. The idea behind this practice is designed to create a fair process, as each interviewer individually scores each applicant, before comparing scores.

One issue with the interview panel is that people will often alter their allocated scores based on what the (natural) group leader decides. In short, humans make judgements based on what they believe other people want to hear. Psychologically, people never want to be seen by others as doing something ‘wrong’ even a personal judgment.

Multiple interview rounds delivered by different hiring managers, especially for senior roles and high-paid positions, result in a better hire – a better higher is the applicant’s actually ability to perform well once employed. This is due to similar questions being asked in several structured job interviews (and often one informal job interview and/or assessment round) by various professionals who can review interview answers from different perspectives.

  1. Spread interviews out

Most organisations during the recruitment window will offer interviews to candidates over the short period of 1-2 days. On average 8 people are offered job interviews for every advertised position, with each interview lasting around 45-60 mins. This back-to-back recruitment practice is tiring for the interview panel, which can negatively affect the decision-making process.

The solution is to have one, or maybe two interviews scheduled a day with flexibility between interviewees to allow, if needed, an interview to run over. Asking additional questions to gather more information and details, rather than sticking strictly to the initial set of questions can ‘open up’ an applicant allowing the interview panel to more easily predicted that persons job performance, and fit within the team.

Asking ‘what was your role in that example?’ or ‘ how did you come to that solution?’ or ‘what mistakes did you make before you were successful?’ to a pre-set interview question gathers more intelligence.

  1. Give a task

They say a picture paints a thousand words. But if you talk the talk can you walk the walk?

For many job roles, a key part of the required task will be a particular action; from writing risk assessments to completing calculations, from problem-solving to selling, from cooking to code-breaking. If the main task is something that can be tested, test it.

Set the task in real conditions, using a task the applicant would be doing once employed, and check their ability to complete the required job duties.

Evolve the mind book on Amazon
  1. Think about the team culture

A new hire can make or break an existing team. Hiring a new employee can add some spice to the team, creating a new energy, new motivation, and a new purpose. Famously the difference between Steve Jobs being rehired at Apple compare to the period when Jobs wasn’t employed was the difference in why we still view Apple products as a consumer favorite.

One of the interview stages must be questions to review the employee’s temperament and to match that to the team culture. Team culture interview questions can include:

  • Are you a goal or problem-orientated person?
  • Do you work better within a team or on your own?
  • What motivates you the most, starting or finishing a task?
  • What’s the most important thing to you in a job?
  • How do you describe your role within a team?

Recruitment has changed over the past 10 years, career professionals are more likely to quit than to work in a job they dislike, many employees job-hop every 3-5 years, and first-choice hires will decline not only job offers but job interviews if they deem them not worthy. The job interview itself is one of the ways an applicant will decide of they are likely to take an offered role. As well as having to balance the design of the recruitment process to be seen as a good hire, employers must think about an interview process that ensures they hire an individual that will not only fit within their existing team but that will add value to the organisation.

The 5 step interview process

Implementing the 5 simple interview steps; a structured multiple-round job interview, within team, and job-directed questions over a period of time allows an employer the time and space to recruit someone worthy of their advertised salary.

In a job interview, positive body language complements verbal communication and significantly impacts how you are perceived by interviewers.

Demonstrating confidence, professionalism, active engagement, and genuine interest through your non-verbal cues can leave a lasting impression and differentiate you from other candidates.

Remember to maintain eye contact, use appropriate hand gestures, and be mindful of your posture throughout the interview. A warm and genuine smile can convey enthusiasm and likability. By mastering positive body language, you enhance your chances of success in job interviews and project yourself as the ideal candidate for the role.